mc cain: wrong on almost everything.
The problem with iran started with their takeover of the american embassy in 1979, right? WRONG. the trouble with iran started when we OVERTHREW THEIR GOVERNMENT and installed the shah. hmmmmm. that fact is NEVER mentioned in the press when the talk is about iran. i wonder why that is. could it be that america never wants to admit that it did something wrong? by just ignoring history, the american government can then rewrite it.
i bring this up because john mc cain thinks that the way to "deal" with iran (lol) is through tough talk, sanctions and the threat of war whereas barrack obama thinks that the way to reach some kind of peaceful agreement is through diplomacy.
mc cain = wrong on iran.
obama = right on iran
mc cain' claim that obama is "wrong" on iraq is based on obama's opposition to the "surge". however that is akin to someone shooting a person in cold blood and then bending over to help stop the bleeding and then saying, 'look what a humanitarian i am." obama was AGAINST THE UNPROVOKED ATTACK ON IRAQ IN THE FIRST PLACE. the surge has nothing to do with it.
mc cain = wrong on iraq
obama = right on iraq
since attention spans are so incredibly short in the american electorate let me, once again, point out that georgia STARTED the conflict with russia (and against american advice, by the way). mc cain immediately started his "war is the answer" dialogue and blamed russia. obama was much more diplomatic and put the blame on both parties and said the way to stablity in that area of the world would come about through diplomacy and talks with all the parties.
(russia lost more people in world war II than the rest of the allies (( excluding china)) combined. russia has been attacked by the west multiple times but russia has never attacked the west.)
so
mc cain = wrong on russia
obama = right on russia
mc cain wrong for america, wrong for peace, wrong for the enviroment, wrong for the economy.
obama right for america, right for peace, right for the enviroment, right for the economy.
say, did you see that hard hitting interview of palin this past weekend on all the tv news talk shows? oh, you didn't. BECAUSE THE REPUBLICANS WON'T LET HER BE INTERVIEWED! they even said that they wouldn't until they were sure that the press would show some deference to her. deference? what kind of shit is that? what is she, the fucking queen?
oh well, rock and roll and peace to all
i bring this up because john mc cain thinks that the way to "deal" with iran (lol) is through tough talk, sanctions and the threat of war whereas barrack obama thinks that the way to reach some kind of peaceful agreement is through diplomacy.
mc cain = wrong on iran.
obama = right on iran
mc cain' claim that obama is "wrong" on iraq is based on obama's opposition to the "surge". however that is akin to someone shooting a person in cold blood and then bending over to help stop the bleeding and then saying, 'look what a humanitarian i am." obama was AGAINST THE UNPROVOKED ATTACK ON IRAQ IN THE FIRST PLACE. the surge has nothing to do with it.
mc cain = wrong on iraq
obama = right on iraq
since attention spans are so incredibly short in the american electorate let me, once again, point out that georgia STARTED the conflict with russia (and against american advice, by the way). mc cain immediately started his "war is the answer" dialogue and blamed russia. obama was much more diplomatic and put the blame on both parties and said the way to stablity in that area of the world would come about through diplomacy and talks with all the parties.
(russia lost more people in world war II than the rest of the allies (( excluding china)) combined. russia has been attacked by the west multiple times but russia has never attacked the west.)
so
mc cain = wrong on russia
obama = right on russia
mc cain wrong for america, wrong for peace, wrong for the enviroment, wrong for the economy.
obama right for america, right for peace, right for the enviroment, right for the economy.
say, did you see that hard hitting interview of palin this past weekend on all the tv news talk shows? oh, you didn't. BECAUSE THE REPUBLICANS WON'T LET HER BE INTERVIEWED! they even said that they wouldn't until they were sure that the press would show some deference to her. deference? what kind of shit is that? what is she, the fucking queen?
oh well, rock and roll and peace to all
posted by Ron Shock | 9:55 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home